|
In The News
Daymon Worldwide Announces Comprehensive Research Study Into Global Food Culture Shifts, Powered by the Hartman Group. |
|
In The News
Daymon Worldwide Announces Comprehensive Research Study Into Global Food Culture Shifts, Powered by the Hartman Group. |
02.03.2011
“HartBeat” is The Hartman Group's FREE online newsletter, providing insight, analysis, information and strategy to give business leaders the knowledge and vision to build sustainable brands.
Archives »
Click here for an archive of past HartBeat articles
So let's get this straight: We've all learned about the first pyramid, but apparently haven't been interested in following its guidelines, and as a result we've (mostly) gotten fatter. And the best response we can muster as a nation is to offer a substantially more complex, multi-faceted pyramid that is custom-tailored to meet differing lifestyles and nutritional needs? While some critics (ourselves included) might immediately question the logic of complicating a tool that has already failed to gain widespread cultural legitimacy, our own research suggests there is a more fundamental problem here. Namely, American consumers simply cannot and will not consistently eat according to a scientific formula, no matter how neatly it is packaged. In other words, it is not the content, packaging or marketing of the food pyramid that's the problem, it's the pyramid itself.Likewise, we found surprising inspiration in a similar critique first published in July 2006:
We find that most proposed solutions, such as those offered in a 3,500 word polemic New York Times op-ed by Eleanor Randolph, fit neatly into the "teach" and "tinker" buckets. For example:
Strangely, we find that none of the 10 suggestions listed above begin to directly address the pink elephant hovering in the corner. The root problem, of course, is that we simply consume far, far, far too many calories for our own good. Yes, you read that correctly: We eat way too much food. But rather than tackle the problem head on, most in public policy circles appear satisfied to offer up suggestions of the teach and tinker variety, which only hint indirectly at our pathological tendency to over consume.
True, banning junk food sales in schools might help reduce the consumption of so-called empty calories. But if we replaced sodas and candy with juice, nuts and popcorn, our children are still consuming unnecessary calories, no? Might it make more sense to ask how and when it even became acceptable for children to snack in school? Why would we even have vending machines in schools, no matter what is inside them?
Read the article and download the white paper here ».
The government's latest attempt at curbing the obesity pandemic in America may be well intentioned, but, once again, the FDA fails to see that food is not the problem. "Playing dress up" doesn't make the food pyramid any more effective for kids than it does for adults. The media feeding frenzy surrounding childhood obesity issues has compelled the federal government to do something, anything to demonstrate its commitment to solving the problem, even if it is to put a new spin on a tired, unsuccessful polygonal chart.
Read the article here »